Intervenciones urbanas y tejido social en la Ciudad de México

  • Beatriz Itzel Cruz Megchun American University of Sharjah
Palabras clave: intervenciones urbanas, comunidad, identidad, tejido social, práctica-lugar, diseño

Resumen

Esta investigación explora el uso de intervenciones urbanas como un medio para fortalecer el tejido social en una zona marginal de la Ciudad de México. Al mismo, trata de entender la taxonomía de las intervenciones junto con sus operaciones para revelar la posible parti- cipación del diseño. Un caso de estudio longitudinal fue utilizado para discutir la evolución de las intervenciones urbanas y la participación ciudadana en un área geográfica específica. Durante la recolección de datos se documentaron mejoras en el tejido social de la comu- nidad. Los resultados exhibieron tres diferentes tipos de intervenciones y colaboraciones permitiendo transformaciones sociales y desarrollo cultural.

Biografía del autor/a

Beatriz Itzel Cruz Megchun, American University of Sharjah

Doctora en Gestión de diseño por la Universidad de Staffordshire y Maestra en Gestión de diseño por la Universidad de Salford, ambas en Reino Unido. Licenciada en Diseño Industrial, por la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco. Obtuvo su doctorado con la tesis enfocada en la utilización del diseño como herramienta para impulsar empresas de base tecnológicas en nuevas industrias. Actualmente es profesora asistente del Colegio de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño en la Universidad Americana de Sharjah, Emiratos Árabes Unidos

Citas

Alexiou, K.; Johnson, J. & Zamenopoulos, T. (2010). Embracing Complexity in Design: Emerging Perspectives and Opportunities, in Designing for the 21st Century Interdisciplinary Methods and Findings,Tom Inns, ed., London: Gower, 87-100.

Augé, M. (1995).Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of supermodernity. London, England: Verso.

Aractingi, J. & Le Pape, G. (2011).Rituals and catechisms in ecumenical rite in East and West at the crossroads masonics. Paris, France: Editions L’Harmattan.

Aravena, A. (2006). La ciudad como Fuente de Equidad. ACTAR Architecture Boogazine, 6, 160-167.

Balnaves, M. & Caputi, P. (2001).Introduction to quantitative research methods: An investigative approach. London, England: Sage.

Bell, C. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.

Bertola, P. & Teixeira, J. (2003).Design as a knowledge agent: How design as a knowledge process is embedded into organizations to foster innovation. Design Studies, 24(3), 181-194. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00036-4

Borja de Mozota, B. (2006, a).The four power of design: A value model in design management. Design Management Review, 17(2), 44-53.

Borja de Mozota, B.(2006, b).A theoretical model for design in management science: From management as a constraint to management science as an opportunity for the design profession. Design Management Review 3(1) 2006, 11B

ruce, M.; Cooper, R., & Vazquez, D. (1999).Effective design management for small business. Design Studies, 20(3), 297-315. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00022-2

Bryman, A. (1989).Research methods and organization studies. London, London: Routledge.

Buchanan, R. & Margolini, V. (1995, Eds.). Discovering Design. Illinois, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Candi, M. (2005). Design as an element of innovation: Evaluating design emphasis and focus in new technology-based firms. Háskólinn: Reykjavik University.

Casey, E. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairy short stretch of time: Phenomenological prolegomena. En S. Feld & K. Basso (Eds.), A Senses of Place (pp. 13-52). Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press.

Certeau, M. (1990, Eds.).L’Invention du quotidian. 1 Arts de Faire. Gallimard: Folio-Essais.

CEPAL. (2007).Cohesión social. Inlcusión y sentido de pertinência en América Latina y el Caribe.Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, AECID, SEGIB.

Cloke, P., Philo, C., & Sadler, D. (1991) Approaching human geography. London, England: Sage Publications.Coleman, P., & Collins, S. (Eds.) Locating the Field: Space, Place and Context in Anthropology (67-86) Oxford, England: Berg.

Collins, J. & Hussey, R. (1996). Business research: A practical guide to undergraduate and postgraduate students. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(3rd ed.). London, England: Sage Publications.

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London, England: Sage.

Devine-Wright, P., & Lyons, E. (1997).Remembering Pasts and Representing Places: The Construction of National Identities in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1): 33–45, doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0037

Durkheim, E. (1997). The division of labor in society. New York, New York: Free Press.

Elkington, J. (1999).Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Minnesota, Minnesota: Capstone Publishing Ltd.

Entrikin, J.N. (1991).The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

EUROsociAL (2016, noviembre, 15).Social Cohesion[Web log] Recuperado de: http://eurosocial-ii.eu/en/pagina/cohesion-social

FIIAPP (2011).Putting social cohesion into public policies: Why, how, and who? Strategies for integrating social cohesion in public policies. Development Centre-OECD. Paris, 20-21 January 2011.

Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: A how it’s transforming work, leisure and everyday life. New York, New York: Basic Books.

Frias-Peña, J. (2005) The strategic role of industrial designers in developing innovative products in SMEs, [PhD thesis].

Gaspar-Guadarrama, A. (2012). In search for a reader city: Book clubs in Mexico City. Mexico City: Ministry of Culture, 58. En busca de una ciudad lectora. Libro Clubes de la Ciudad de México.

Gobierno de Mexico (2016, Abril 15).Qué es el Laboratorio de Cohesión Social? [Web log] Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/amexcid/articulos/que-es-el-laboratorio-de-cohesion-social?idiom=es

Gomm, R.; Hammersley, M., & Foster, P. (Eds.) (2000).Case study method. London, London: Sage.

Halbwachs, M. (1950). Collective memory. New York, New York: Harper and Row Colophon Books.

Hargadon, A. & Douglas, Y. (2001). When Innovation meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 716-749. doi: 10.2307/3094872

Healy, M. & Perry, C. (1998). Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qualitative market research: An International Journal 3(3): 118-126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13522750010333861

Hernández-Sampieri, R.; Fernandez-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (1998). Research Methods, (2nd ed.), Mexico City, Mexico: Mcgraw-Hill.

Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002).The cultural industries. London, England: Sage.

Hirsch, E. (1995).Landscape: Between place and space. En E. Hirsch & M. O’Hanlon (Eds.), The anthropology of landscape: Perspectives on place and space. Oxford. England: Claredon Press.

Hubbard, P., Kitchin, R., & Valentine, G. (2004). Key thinkers on space and place. London, England: Sage.

Ingold, T. (2008).Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning, A 40, 1746-1810. doi: 10.1068/a40156

Inns, T. (Eds.) (2007).Designing for the 21st century: Interdisciplinary questions and insights. Hampshire, England: Gower.

Jauhiainen, J.S. (2005).Linnageograafia. Linnad ja linnauurimus modernismist postmodernismini, Tallinn (Eesti Kunstiakadeemia).

Jorgensen, B.S., & Stedman, R.C. (2001). Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes Toward Their Properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3): 233–248, doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0226

Kotler, P. & Rath, G. A. (1984). Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. Journal of Business Strategy, 5, 16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb039054

Kostof, S. (1991). The City Shaped: urban Patterns and Meanings through History. New York: Bulfinch Press.

Laboratorio de Cohesión social a través de AMEXID.(2016). ¿Qué es el Laboratorio de Cohesión Social?. Recuperado de: https://www.gob.mx/amexcid/articulos/que-es-el-laboratorio-de-cohesion-social?idiom=es

La Varra, G. (2003).Post it city: The other European public spaces in S. Boeri, Multiplicity. USE-Uncertain States of Europe. Milan, Italy: Skira.

Lee, J. & Ingold, T. (2006). Fieldwork on foot: Perceiving, routing, socializing. En S., Lefebvre, H. (1991).The Production of Space. Oxford, Massachusetts: Blackwell.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford, Massachusetts: Blackwell.

Lincon, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

Low, S. (1994), Place Attachment in Cultural Anthropology. National Geographical Journal of India, 40(1-4): 47–61. Special Issue on ‘The Spirit and Power of Place’.

Martin, D.G. (2003). ‘Place-Framing’ as Place-Making: Constituting a Neighborhood for Organizing and Activism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3): 730–750, doi:10.1111/1467-8306.9303011

Massey, D. (2005). For space. London, England: Sage.

Mitleton-Kelly, Eve (2010). Identifying the multi-dimensional problem space & co-creating an enabling environment. En: 1st International Workshop on Complexity and Real World Applications, Southampton, UK.

Montaner, J. (2013).Arquitectura y crítica (3rd ed.). Barcelona, Cataluña: Editorial Gustavo Gili.

Moustakas, C. (1994).Phenomenological research methods. California, California: Sage Publications.

Newman, W. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.

Norman, D.A. (2002). The Design of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Norman, D.A. (2004). Emotional Design. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Oppenheim, A. (2000).Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London, England: Continum.

Ottone, E. (2007).Cohesión social: Inclusión y sentido de pertenencia en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile, Chile: Naciones Unidas.

Paasi, A. (2001). Bounded spaces in the mobile world: Deconstructing ‘regional identity, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93(2): 137–148, doi:10.1111/1467-9663.00190

Pearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Illinois, Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Pink, S. (2012). Situating everyday life: practices and places. London, England: Sage

Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.

Rosa, S. & Weiland (2013). Handmade Urbanism: From community initiatives to participatory models. Berlin, Germany: Jovis

Saar, M., & Palang, H. (2009). The dimension of place meanings. Leaving Reviews in Landscape Research, 3(3): 1-24.

Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. En T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory.London, England: Routledge.

Schwandt, T. (2007). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Seamon, D. & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and placelessness, Edward Relph. En P. Hubbard, R. Kitchen, & G. Vallentine (Eds.) Key Texts in Human Geography. London, England: Sage., 43-51

Sheringham, M. (2006). Everyday life: Theories and practices from surrealism to the present. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Solá-Morales, I. (1996). Presente y futuros. La arquitectura en las ciudades. Barcelona, Cataluña: Collegi Oficial d’Arquitectes de Catalunya.

Soja, E.W. (1996), Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-imagined Places. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.

Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Van Wijk, J (2005). The value of visualization. IEEE Visualization, 2005: 79-86.

Vorkinn, M., & Riese, H. (2001). Environmental Concern in a Local Context: The Significance of Place Attachment. Environment and Behavior, 33(2): 249–263, doi:10.1177/00139160121972972.

World Urban Forum (2016, mayo, 22).Report of the third session of the World Urban Forum [Web log] Recuperado de: http://mirror.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/3406_98924_WUF3-Report.pdf

Yamamoto, M., & Lambert, D. R. (1994). The impact of product aesthetics on the evolution of industrial products. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(4): 309-324. doi: 0.1016/0737-6782(94)90086-8

Yin, R. (1994). Case study research design and methods(2nd ed.). London, England: Sage Publication.

Cómo citar
Cruz Megchun, B. I. (1). Intervenciones urbanas y tejido social en la Ciudad de México. Economía Creativa, (7), 68-115. https://doi.org/10.46840/ec.2017.07.04
Sección
Sección arbitrada